Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stannard, in the matter of an application for a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Certiorari against Honourable Vice President McIntyre [2004] FCAFC 310
INDUSTRIAL LAW – application to set aside decision of Australian Industrial Relations Commission ('Commission') – dismissal from employment – initial application for review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) unsuccessful – where applicant then applied for relief under Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), on grounds that termination was 'harsh, unjust or unreasonable' – where Commission considered that the application was barred by s 170HB because a remedy in respect of the same termination had previously been sought – whether Commission had jurisdiction to entertain the application – whether initial application 'commenced under' a law of the Commonwealth – whether initial application was seeking a remedy founded on the termination
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – jurisdiction – extent of a statute's withdrawal of the jurisdiction of a court
words & phrases – 'commenced under', 'in respect of', 'termination'
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6 Public Services Act 1922 (Cth) s 82AH Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 4, 170CA, 170CB, 170CD, 170CE, 170CK, 170CL, 170CM, 170CN, 170FA, 170HB Automatic Fire Sprinklers Proprietary Limited v Watson (1946) 72 CLR 454 cited Boddington v British Transport Police [1992] 2 AC 143 referred to Brackenridge v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (1996) 67 IR 162 referred to CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 141 ALR 618 cited Director General of Education v Suttling (1987) 162 CLR 427 referred to Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 cited Laz v Downer Group Ltd (2000) 108 IR 244 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 referred to Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 considered Qantas Airway Limited v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280 referred to Workers' Compensation Board (Qld) v Technical Products Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 642 applied, in dissent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate