Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NBBZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 312
MIGRATION – appeal from single judge – failure to take relevant consideration into account – whether speculation as to reason for deceit formed part of Refugee Review Tribunal's reasoning – whether error in approach of trial judge MIGRATION – appeal from single judge – obligation of Refugee Review Tribunal to treat applicants fairly – s 424A Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – questions to appellant at Tribunal hearing based on document disclosed to appellant after hearing – whether obligation to treat applicant fairly required document to be disclosed prior to hearing
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) subs 36(1), 36(2) and s 424A NAHV of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 214 followed Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396 approved Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 cited NBBZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL N 1127 of 2004 BRANSON, RD NICHOLSON and NORTH JJ 24 NOVEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1127 of 2004
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN: NBBZ
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: BRANSON, RD NICHOLSON AND NORTH JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 24 NOVEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondents' costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate