Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Repatriation Commission v Hill [2005] FCAFC 7 VETERANS' AFFAIRS – invalidity service pension – application for pension rejected by delegate of Repatriation Commission – appeal to Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal found veteran suffered from several permanent psychiatric illnesses – however, Tribunal found there was "very little wrong" with veteran – Tribunal not satisfied veteran permanently unable to do work for periods adding up to more than eight hours per week – Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate – appeal to single Judge of Federal Court allowed – appeal to Full Court – whether veteran "permanently incapacitated for work" – whether primary judge erred by construing relevant provisions of Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) and Veterans' Entitlements (Income Support Supplement – Permanent Incapacity for Work) Determination 1999 by reference to principles underlying workers' compensation legislation
WORDS AND PHRASES – "work" – "do work" – "permanently incapacitated for work" – "permanently unable to do work"
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 5Q, 6, 7A, 24(1)(b), 37, 37AA, 119(1)(g), 120(1) and (3) Veterans' Entitlements (Income Support Supplement – Permanent Incapacity for Work) Determination 1999 (Cth) cl 5(1) and (2) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 46A
Hill v Repatriation Commission (2004) 207 ALR 470 referred to Cardiff Corporation v Hall [1911] 1 KB 1009 referred to Foster v Wharncliffe Woodmore Colliery Co Ltd [1922] 2 KB 701 referred to Wicks v Union Steamship Co of New Zealand Ltd (1933) 50 CLR 328 referred to REPATRIATION COMMISSION v COLIN HILL NTD16 OF 2004 WILCOX, FRENCH & WEINBERG JJ 16 FEBRUARY 2005 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN DARWIN)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY NTD16 OF 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate