Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Le v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2005] FCAFC 51 MIGRATION – appeal from decision of single judge dismissing application for review – cancellation of visa under s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – procedural fairness – where no written notice setting out reasons for the decision – whether Issues Paper and its annexures put the essential elements of the appellant's case to the Minister – whether Issues Paper and its annexures contained an accurate summary of the matters put by the appellant to the Departmental Officer – whether Issues Paper and its annexures properly identified the issues raised by the appellant concerning the best interest of the appellant's children – whether Minister failed to consider the best interest of the children as a primary consideration – whether there was no consideration 'in truth' of the best interests of the children – the Departmental Officer was not obliged to make further enquiries – the practical content of the obligation to provide procedural fairness was complied with – appeal dismissed
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 198(1), 501(2), 501G Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 25D Braganza v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 170 referred to Djalic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 488 cited Khan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (unreported, Gummow J, 11 December 1987) referred to Le v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 875 referred to Long v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 218 cited Lu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 340 referred to M238 of 2002 v The Honourable Phillip Ruddock, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 260 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 211 ALR 126 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Lorenzo [2005] FCAFC 13 cited Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v W157/00A (2002) 125 FCR 433 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Nezovic v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2003) 133 FCR 190 cited Nguyen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 757 cited Perez v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 119 FCR 454 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 Sebastian v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 31 cited Taurino v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 119 cited Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1998) 150 ALR 608 cited Wan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 107 FCR 133 cited VAN TU LE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS WAD167 of 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate