Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Babicci v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 77
MIGRATION – appeal – Migration Review Tribunal refused to grant a Partner (Provisional) (Class UF) visa – whether Tribunal erred in its construction of the phrase "compelling circumstances" – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error Migration Regulations 1994 reg 1.20J Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cohen (2001) 177 ALR 473 referred to ERIC RICHARD BABICCI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND THE MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA NSD 105 OF 2005 TAMBERLIN, CONTI AND JACOBSON JJ 19 MAY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 105 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ERIC RICHARD BABICCI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: TAMBERLIN, CONTI AND JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 19 MAY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondents' costs in the proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 105 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ERIC RICHARD BABICCI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate