Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nationwide Produce (Holdings) Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Linknarf Limited (In Liquidation) [2005] FCAFC 129 CONTRACT – respondent purchased fruit and vegetables from the appellant and its predecessor business on a regular basis from 1994 to the end of 1998 – repeated refusals by respondent to enter into formal supply arrangement – offer of weekly contract with a right to terminate if the produce did not meet respondent's quality standards was made to the appellant on 6 October 1998 – offer accepted by appellant – appellant subsequently complained that the contact would put him out of business and requested an ongoing contract – produce supplied by the appellant was rejected by respondent – respondent terminated contract on 31 December 1998 – whether a supply contract existed between the parties prior to October 1998 – whether the course of dealing between the parties indicated a mutual intention to enter into a legally binding arrangement – whether the contract conferred a right of first refusal on appellant to supply respondent with fruit and vegetables of certain classes – whether sufficient notice of termination of the contract was given by respondent – whether October 1998 contract should be set aside on the grounds of economic duress and unconscionable conduct by respondent TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51AA, 51AC, 52 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 applied Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 applied Brambles Nationwide Holdings Limited v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 applied Vroom DV v Foster's Brewing Group Ltd [1994] 2 VR 32 cited Mackay v Wilson (1947) 47 SR(NSW) 315 referred to Woodroffe v Box (1954) 92 CLR 245 referred to White Property Developments Ltd v Richmond Growth Pty Ltd (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Madgwick J, 28 January 1998) referred to Crawford Fitting Co v Sydney Valve and Fittings Pty Limited (1988) 14 NSWLR 438 applied Australian Blue Metal Limited v Hughes [1963] AC 74 referred to US Second Restatement on Contracts para. 22(2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate