Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd v Concrete Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 138 COPYRIGHT – infringement – architect's plans – site sold without express licence to use plans – whether licence to be implied – action for unjustified threats COURTS AND JUDGES – apprehension of bias – criticism by judge of parties and their case – exchange between bench and counsel – interference during witnesses' evidence
Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 31, s 36, s 202 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 95 Patents Act 1890 (Cth) s 53 Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Act 1883 (UK) s 32
Dr Melissa Perry, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Disqualification of Judges: Practice and Procedure, 2001
Acohs Pty Ltd v RA Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd (1997) 37 IPR 542 not followed Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) (1992) 26 NSWLR 411 referred to Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd [1990] 1 QB 818 referred to Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 191 cited Barton v Walker [1979] 2 NSWLR 740 referred to Beck v Montana Constructions Pty Ltd [1964-65] NSWR 229 cited Blair v Osborne & Tomkins [1971] 2 QB 78 cited BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 cited Brooks v The Upjohn Company (1998) 85 FCR 469 referred to Byrne & Frew v Australian Airlines Limited (1995) 185 CLR 410 cited Challender v Royle (1887) 36 Ch D 425 considered Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 cited Devefi Pty Ltd v Mateffy Perl Nagy Pty Ltd (1993) 37 IPR 477 referred to Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 cited Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman [2002] 1 AC 408 cited Errington v Krone (1894) 21 VLR 227 considered Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 referred to FA Tamplin Steamship Company, Limited v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Company Ltd [1916] 2 AC 397 cited Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund v Saunders (1994) 52 FCR 48 referred to Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 cited Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 cited International Petroleum Refining Supply Sociedad Ltd v Caleb Brett & Son Ltd (The "Busiris") (1980) 1 Lloyds Rep 569 referred to Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 applied Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd [1957] AC 555 cited Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 cited Luna Advertising Co Ltd v Burnham & Co (1928) 45 RPC 258 cited Meikle v Maufe [1941] 3 All ER 144 cited NG v Clyde Securities Ltd [1976] 1 NSWLR 443 not followed Re Alley; Ex parte Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1985) 64 ALR 6 cited Stovin-Bradford v Volpoint Properties Ltd [1971] Ch 1007 considered The Queen v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248 cited Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 8 referred to U & I Global Trading (Australia) Pty Ltd v Tasman-Warajay Pty Ltd (1995) 32 IPR 494 considered Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate