Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Seven Network (Operations) Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 144
COPYRIGHT – cinematograph film – oral agreement between organiser of charitable undertaking and television station under which television station's camera operator and sound recordist accompanied organiser and troubled youths on trek along Kokoda Track – under agreement, television station to televise short film of trek, on station's news and current affairs program, and organiser to have raw footage subsequently for use to promote the charity – after program went to air, organiser handed tapes of raw footage as arranged – organiser taking tapes to film producer who makes a one-hour documentary, which is proposed to be televised by competitor television station – original television station seeks injunction on basis of threatened infringement of copyright – whether copyright in original raw footage co-owned by organiser and original television station – whether original television station had contracted to assign to organiser its interest in copyright or to grant him a licence – whether licence assignable – construction of oral contract – admissibility of extraneous circumstances – admissibility of party's statements of its intention on an earlier occasion.
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 22(4), 30, 86, 98
Lauri v Renad [1892] 3 Ch 402 cited Cescinsky v George Routledge & Sons Ltd [1916] 2 KB 325 cited Prior v Lansdowne Press Pty Ltd [1977] VR 65 cited Prior v Sheldon (2000) 48 IPR 301 cited Bradley Egg Farm Ltd v Clifford [1943] 2 All ER 378 distinguished W Marshall & Co Ltd v AH Bull Ltd (1901) 85 LT 77 cited Coopers v Stephens [1895] 1 Ch 567 cited Messager v British Broadcasting Co [1927] 2 KB 543 cited Dorling v Honnor Marine Ltd [1964] Ch 560 cited Jones v South-Eastern and Chatham Railway Company's Managing Committee (1918) 87 LJKB 775 R v Connolly [1991] 2 Qd R 171 Adelaide Chemical & Fertilizer Co Ltd v Carlyle (1940) 64 CLR 514 Teper v The Queen [1952] AC 480 Ratten v The Queen [1972] AC 378 James Miller & Partners Ltd v Whitworth Street Estates (Manchester) Ltd [1970] AC 583 L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Limited v St Martins Investments Proprietary Limited (1979) 144 CLR 597 FAI Traders Insurance Company Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 343 White v Australian and New Zealand Theatres Limited (1943) 67 CLR 266 Australian Estates Ltd v Palmer (unreported, New South Wales Court of Appeal, Kirby P, Samuels and Meagher JJA, 22 December 1989) Holroyd v Marshall (1862) 10 HL Cas 191 Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] 1 WLR 623 Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Antaios Compania Naviera S.A. v Salen Rederierna A.B. [1985] AC 191 Summit Investment Inc v British Steel Corporation (The "Sounion") [1987] 1 Lloyd's Reps 230 Ray v Classic FM plc (1998) 41 IPR 235 British Actors Film Company, Limited v Glover [1918] 1 KB 299 Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Kilpin v Ratley [1892] 1 QB 582 Pacific Film Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1970) 121 CLR 154 United Dominion Corporation Ltd v Brian Pty Ltd [1983] 157 CLR 1 Norman v FC of T (1963) 109 CLR 9
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate