Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
M87 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 148 MIGRATION – appeal - whether failure to accord procedural fairness – whether in the interests of justice for the appellant to raise a new ground of appeal – no issue of principle H v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2000) 63 ALD 43 VAAC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1
APPLICANT M87 OF 2002 v the honourable philip ruddock, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs and the refugee review tribunal V103 OF 2005 SUNDBERG, MARSHALL AND NORTH JJ MELBOURNE 4 AUGUST 2005
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 103 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M87 OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: THE HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK, MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: Sundberg, Marshall and North JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 5 AUGUST 2005
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The Refugee Review Tribunal is added as second respondent. 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs of this appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 103 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT M87 OF 2002
APPELLANT
AND: THE HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK, MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate