Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 255 PATENTS – patent for deadlock which can be unlocked from outside – whether obvious – whether infringed – whether insufficiency Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7, 18(1)(b), 40(2)(a) Doric Products Pty Ltd v Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd (2001) 192 ALR 306 approved Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2003) 56 IPR 479 cited Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 274 cited Sami S Svendsen Inc v Independent Products Canada Ltd (1968) 119 CLR 156 not followed Pinefair v Bedford Industries (1998) 87 FCR 458 cited Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 Radiation Ltd v Galliers and Klaerr Pty Ltd (1938) 60 CLR 36 cited Shave v HV McKay Massey Harris Pty Ltd (1935) 52 CLR 701 at 708-710 cited Marconi's Wireless Telegraph Co v Phillips Lamps Ltd [1933] RPC 287 at 303 cited Olin Corporation v Super Cartridge Co Pty Ltd (1977) 180 CLR 236 at 246 cited Flexible Steel Lacing Company v Beltreco Ltd (2000) 49 IPR 331 at [77] cited Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v Beiersdorf (Australia) Limited (1980) 144 CLR 253 at 267, 292, 295 applied NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 239 at 286 cited K & S Lake City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 309 at 315 cited CIC Insurance Limited v Bankstown Football Club Limited (1997) 187 CLR 384 at 408 applied Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2004) 78 ALJR 585 at [10]-[13] cited Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Arico Trading International Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 1 at 13 applied Elconnex Pty Ltd v Gerard Industries Pty Ltd (1992) 25 IPR 173 at 183 cited Wellcome Foundation Ltd v VR Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 262 at 280 cited Re Raychem Corp's Patents [1998] RPC 31 at 41‑42 cited Winner v Ammar Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 24 IPR 137 cited Intalite International NV v Cellular Ceilings (No 2) [1987] RPC 537 at 547 Bristol‑Myers Squibb Co v FH Faulding & Co Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 524 at 541 applied Leonardis v Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd (1996) 67 FCR 126 cited Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Tyco Electronics Pty Ltd (2002) 56 IPR 248 cited Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2002) 212 CLR 411 cited Sunbeam Corporation v Morphy‑Richards (Aust) Pty Ltd (1961) 180 CLR 98 at 111 cited Advanced Building Systems Pty Ltd v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 171 at 181 applied SW Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 467 at 478, 491 applied Bartlem Pty Ltd v Cox Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 449 at [89]‑[91] cited Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1997] RPC 1 at 45 cited Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 at [25] cited Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 354 at [50]‑[54] cited Firebelt Pty Ltd v Brambles Australia Ltd (2002) 188 ALR 280 at [36] cited Microsoft Corporation v Intertrust Technologies Corporation (2003) 59 IPR 260 at [21] cited Raleigh Cycle Co Ltd v H Miller and Coy Ltd (1948) 65 RPC 141 at 146, 148, 161 followed AMP Inc v Utilux Pty Ltd (1971) 45 ALJR 123 at 128 applied Winner v Ammar Holdings Pty Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 205 at 217 applied Grove Hill Pty Ltd v Great Western Corporation Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 257 at [168]-[174] applied Arrow Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Merck & Co Inc (2003) 58 IPR 231 cited British United Shoe Machinery Co Ltd v A Fussell & Sons Ltd (1908) 25 RPC 631 at 651 applied May v Higgins (1916) 21 CLR 119 applied CIPA Guide to the Patents Act 5th ed (2001) par 3.12 LOCKWOOD SECURITY PRODUCTS PTY LTD v DORIC PRODUCTS PTY LTD NSD 281 OF 2002 HEEREY, SUNDBERG AND BENNETT JJ 8 DECEMBER 2005 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate