Yevad Products Pty Ltd v Brookfield [2005] FCAFC 263

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Yevad Products Pty Ltd v Brookfield [2005] FCAFC 263 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to reopen appeal and to vary orders of full court after entered – grounds of appeal alleged not to have been considered – jurisdiction to reopen – reopening to order new trial on particular issue – stay of costs order – reference to trial judge of application for summary dismissal of respondents' motion

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules O 35 r 7(1), O 35 r 7(2), O 35 r 7(4) Australian Fisheries Management Authority v PW Adams Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 66 FCR 349 Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union [2001] FCA 336 Brookfield v Yevad Products Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1164 Brookfield v Davey Products Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-635 Brookfield v Davey Products Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 303 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 380 Castanho v Brown & Root (UK) Ltd [1981] AC 557 CSR Ltd v Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 345 Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 2) (2001) 112 FCR 324 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Donkin v AGC (Advances) Ltd [1995] FCA 695 Fox v Commissioner for Superannuation (No 2) (1999) 88 FCR 416 Gamser v Nominal Defendant (1977) 136 CLR 145 Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418 TJM Products Pty Ltd v A & P Tyres Pty Ltd (1987) 17 FCR 390 Yevad Products Pty Ltd v Brookfield [2005] FCAFC 177 Wati v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 543 Westsub Discounts Pty Ltd v Idaps Australia Ltd (No 2) (1990) 94 ALR 310

YEVAD PRODUCTS PTY LTD (formerly known as DAVEY PRODUCTS PTY LTD) v IAN WALTER BROOKFIELD and SEPTIC PRODUCTS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)