Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZEEU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 2 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – circumstances in which a later Full Court can depart from an earlier Full Court decision – stare decisis – determining ratio decidendi – application of Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry (2001) 110 FCR 27 MIGRATION – the application of s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – meaning of 'application', 'information', and 'reason, or part of the reason' in s 424A WORDS AND PHRASES- 'information … that the applicant gave for the purpose of the application', 'information that the Tribunal considers would be the reason, or a part of the reason, for affirming the decision that is under review', 'application', 'plainly wrong' Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 424A(1)(a), 424A(3)(b) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1) Antoun v The Queen [2006] HCA 2 referred to Attorney-General for NSW v Perpetual Trustee Co (Ltd) (1952) 85 CLR 237 referred to Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Limited (1993) 177 CLR 485 referred to Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd [1957] 2 QB 1 referred to Bennett & Wood v Orange City Council [1967] 1 NSWR 502 referred to Bridges v Bridges (1945) 45 SR (NSW) 64 referred to Chamberlain v The Queen (1983) 72 FLR 1 followed Dagli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 541 referred to Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264 referred to John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 166 CLR 417 cited Lu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 141 FCR 346 referred to Miliangos v George Frank (Textiles) Ltd [1976] AC 443 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry (2001) 110 FCR 27 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SZAYW [2005] FCAFC 154 referred to MZWPK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1256 disapproved NAIH of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 124 FCR 223 discussed and explained NAZY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 744 discussed Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 referred to Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396 discussed and not followed in part Pretoria City Council v Levison 1949 (3) SA 305 referred to Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 referred to SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162 applied Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 referred to SZECF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1200 discussed and applied SZEFM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 78 referred to SZEKY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1138 disapproved Telstra Corporation Ltd v Treloar (2000) 102 FCR 595 referred to Tin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 referred to Transurban City Link v Allan (1999) 95 FCR 553 followed VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 discussed not followed in part Victoria v Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 416 referred to Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 39 referred to Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company, Limited [1944] 1 KB 718 referred to Zecevic v Direction of Public Prosecutions (Victoria) (1987) 162 CLR 645 referred to R Cross and JW Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th ed, 1991) AL Goodhardt "Precedent in English and Continental Law" (1934) Law Quarterly Review 40 G Williams, Learning the Law (1982, 11th ed) J Stone, Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings (1964) Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234 The Complete Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed, 1991)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate