Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZCWP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 9 IMMIGRATION – Refugees – Application for protection visa – Applicant Nepalese citizen who was associated with Maoist insurgents – Applicant held to be excluded from application of Refugees Convention on the basis of serious reasons for considering he had committed war crimes and crimes against humanity – Whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law in determining that question – Tribunal's application of definitions in Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court – Whether Tribunal failed to have regard to particular requirements of definitions. Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 36(2) 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Article 1F Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Articles 7(1), 8(2), 9 SZCWP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 1321 OF 2004 WILCOX, GYLES and DOWNES JJ 20 FEBRUARY 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1321 of 2004
BETWEEN: SZCWP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: WILCOX, GYLES, DOWNES JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 20 FEBRUARY 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1321 of 2004
BETWEEN: SZCWP
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: WILCOX, GYLES, DOWNES JJ
DATE: 20 FEBRUARY 2006
PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate