Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Purvis v Dairy Adjustment Authority (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 38 COSTS – unnecessary appeal papers – obligation to cooperate in the preparation of appeal index so as to avoid unnecessary costs Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Federal Court Rules O 52 r 28, O 53 r 16 RONALD PURVIS, KAYLENE PURVIS & ROGER CLARK v DAIRY ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY No SAD 77 of 2005 BLACK CJ, BRANSON & FINN JJ ADELAIDE 22 MARCH 2006
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 77 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: RONALD PURVIS
FIRST APPLICANT
KAYLENE PURVIS
SECOND APPLICANT
ROGER CLARK
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: DAIRY ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, BRANSON & FINN JJ DATE OF ORDER: 22 MARCH 2006
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondent pay to the applicants 50 per cent of the costs of the preparation of the appeal papers. 2. Subject to order 1 hereof, the applicants pay the respondent's costs of the application other than the respondent's costs of and incidental to its notice of contention. 3. The costs ordered to be paid by order 1 hereof be set off against the costs ordered to be paid by order 2 hereof. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 77 of 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: RONALD PURVIS
FIRST APPLICANT
KAYLENE PURVIS
SECOND APPLICANT
ROGER CLARK
THIRD APPLICANT
AND: DAIRY ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, BRANSON & FINN JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate