Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Lay Lat [2006] FCAFC 61 MIGRATION – application for Business Skills Migrant visa – failure to satisfy Regulation 131.214 - procedural fairness - opportunity to respond to critical issue on which decision likely to turn – right to comment upon adverse material from third party – whether critical issue obvious to applicant - whether issue apparent from nature or terms of statute - whether applicant knew Regulation 131.214 in issue MIGRATION – procedural fairness - whether common law procedural fairness excluded by s 51A of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – exhaustive statement of natural justice hearing rule - proper construction of ss 51A, 357A and 422B MIGRATION - finding by delegate that criterion in Regulation 131.214 was not satisfied – whether evidence required in order to make finding that not satisfied – effect of s 65 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – ss 51A, 57, 65, 357A, 422B Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – reg 131
Applicant M17 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 85 ALD 597 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Limited (1994) 49 FCR 576 referred to Katisat v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1908 referred to Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v VSAF of 2003 [2005] FCAFC 73 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Moradian v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 142 FCR 170 referred to NAMW v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 140 FCA 572 referred to NAQF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 130 FCR 456 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 referred to SBTC v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 260 referred to SJSB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 225 referred to SZBDF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1493 referred to SZEGT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1514 referred to VXDC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 146 FCR 562 affirmed WAID v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 220 referred to WAJR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 204 ALR 624 referred to Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 221 referred to MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v LAY LAT NSD140 of 2006 HEEREY, CONTI AND JACOBSON JJ 12 MAY 2006 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate