Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pradabsuk v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 66
MIGRATION – visa application – whether there can be substantial compliance with the requirement to provide satisfactory evidence that the Australian Federal Police has completed a check of criminal records – whether certificate furnished by the Western Australian Police Service comprised satisfactory evidence of criminal records check – appeal dismissed
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 45, 46, 46(1), 47 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 23C Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.07, Sch 1 cl 1128CA, cl 1128CA(3)(d), cl 1128CA(3)(d)(ii) Kim v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 82 ALD 51 distinguished Minister for Immigration & Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Kim (2004) 141 FCR 315 distinguished Wu v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 64 FCR 245 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Li (2000) 103 FCR 486 cited Bal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 189 ALR 566 cited Formosa v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 46 FCR 117 cited SUPAPORN PRADABSUK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS WAD 137 of 2005 RATCHANEE VICHEANARATTANAPONG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS WAD 138 OF 2005 FRENCH, STONE & SIOPIS JJ 17 MAY 2006 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 137 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SUPAPORN PRADABSUK
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGES: FRENCH, STONE & SIOPIS JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate