Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited [2006] FCAFC 86 EVIDENCE – legal professional privilege – waiver – implied waiver – issue waiver – where privilege-holder acts inconsistently with the privilege by putting the contents of otherwise privileged documents in issue – Commissioner of Taxation identified bases for satisfaction and exercises of discretion as matters evidenced in these documents – test of waiver of privilege
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), ss 6-5 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), ss 46A,160ARX, 160ASB, 227 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), ss 14ZZ, 14ZZO(b) Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948, s 5A(1)(d)(v)(c) and s 5A(2)
Federal Court Rules, O 52 r 2AA, O52B r 5(a)(v)
Rio Tinto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 55 ATR 321 discussed Rio Tinto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 1336 discussed Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 discussed Waterford v The Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 discussed Avon Downs Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 referred to Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 discussed Minister for Education v Lovegrove Turf Services Pty Ltd [2004] WASCA 305 referred to British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524 referred to Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 referred to The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 referred to Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (2005) 144 FCR 379 referred to House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 referred to Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 referred to Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83 referred to DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499 considered Thomason v Campbelltown Municipal Council (1939) 39 SR (NSW) 347 discussed United States Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products International Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court, New South Wales, 13 October 1981) considered Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 referred to Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate