Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sons of Gwalia Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Margaretic [2006] FCAFC 92 Sons of Gwalia Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Margaretic [2006] FCAFC 17, (2006) 56 ACSR 585 related SONS OF GWALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) v LUKA MARGARETIC and ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC NSD 1816 of 2005 ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC v LUKA MARGARETIC and SONS OF GWALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) NSD 1872 of 2005 FINKELSTEIN, GYLES and JACOBSON JJ 15 JUNE 2006 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1816 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SONS OF GWALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
APPELLANT
AND: LUKA MARGARETIC
FIRST RESPONDENT
ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: FINKELSTEIN, GYLES AND JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 15 JUNE 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent Luka Margaretic. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1872 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
APPELLANT
AND: LUKA MARGARETIC
FIRST RESPONDENT
SONS OF GWALIA LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: FINKELSTEIN, GYLES AND JACOBSON JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 15 JUNE 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The second respondent Sons of Gwalia Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) pay the costs of the first respondent Luka Margaretic. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate