Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2006] FCAFC 125
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE – diesel fuel rebate – whether fuel used at residential premises – at hospitals, nursing homes and aged person homes – public utility under general statutory obligation to provide electricity to customers in north Queensland – provision of electricity to island communities in the Torres Strait – whether purchase of fuel "for use" by public utility provider "at" residential and other premises – whether the criteria in s 78A(1) (b), (c) and (d) of the Excise Act 1901 satisfied by the undisputed facts – whether a question of law sufficiently formulated – appeal against setting aside Tribunal decision dismissed Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Excise Act 1901 (Cth), s 78A(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 164(1) Electricity Act 1994 (Qld), s 49 Federal Court Rules, O 53 r 3(2) Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 referred to Re Warmun Community (Turkey Creek) Inc v Chief Executive Officer of Customs (2000) 58 ALD 797 referred to Collector of Customs, Tasmania v Flinders Island Community Association (1985) 7 FCR 205 followed Collector of Customs v Rottnest Island Authority (1994) 48 FCR 177 followed Cowell Electric Supply Company Ltd v Collector of Customs (1995) 54 FCR 1 distinguished Commissioner of Taxation v Ergon Energy Corporation Ltd [2005] FCA 1918 referred to Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 followed Re Queensland Electricity Commission v Collector of Customs (1990) 13 AAR 119 referred to Coober Pedy v Collector of Customs (1993) 42 FCR 127 referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Roberts (1992) 37 FCR 246 referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Cooper (1991) 29 FCR 177 referred to Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council (2001) 202 CLR 439 applied Lombardo v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1979) 40 FLR 208 referred to Australian National Railways Commission v Collector of Customs (SA) (1985) 8 FCR 264 referred to TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate