Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Griffiths v Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Limited [2006] FCAFC 149
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – the slip rule – whether the slip rule authorizes the making of an order after the expiration of the statutory time limit for doing so – whether the power for doing so is restricted to a superior court of record PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether 'reserving judgment' is an order in itself – whether 'reserving judgment' is an order of adjournment
WORDS AND PHRASES – 'judgment or order', 'adjourn', 'adjournment'
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 43, 52(4), 52(5) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) ss 42, 43, 90 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459R Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 4, 59(4) Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth) s 13 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) Federal Court Rules, O 1 r 4, O 19 r 7, O 30 r 3, O 35 r 7(3) Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 rr 1.05, 16.05, 16.5, 16.07, 16.08 Supreme Court Act 1867 (Qld) ss 24, 30, 33
Elyard Corporation Pty Ltd v DDB Needham Sydney Pty Ltd (1991) 61 FCR 384 questioned Gikas v Paparagiouto (1977) 2 NSWLR 945 cited R v Essex Justices; ex parte Final [1963] 2 QB 816 cited Bankstown Grammar School Ltd v Park [2000] FCA 1205 discussed Re Howell; ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 70 FCR 261 considered Komesaroff v Law Institute of Victoria (1997) FCA 965 considered Re Langridge; ex parte Bennett Carroll and Gibbons (1998) FCA 879 considered Matthews v Collett [2000] FCA 224 discussed Re Young; ex parte Smith (1985) 5 FCR 204 cited Ah Toy v Registrar of Companies (1985) 10 FCR 280 cited Minister for Works (WA) v Civil and Civic Pty Ltd (1966-67) 116 CLR 273 considered Driclad Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1968) 121 CLR 45 discussed Moller v Roy (1975) 132 CLR 622 discussed Saffron v The Queen (1953) 88 CLR 523 considered The President of India v The Moor Line Limited (No 2) (1955-1958) 99 CLR 212 cited Westpac Banking Corporation v E & W Jury Pty Ltd (1998) 16 ACLC 540 discussed Whitaker v Wisbey (1852) Cox's CC 107 cited Yapp v Williams (1901) WN 9113 ALR 645 considered In re Keystone Knitting Mills' Trade Mark [1929] 1 Ch 92 cited Thunderbird Products Corporation v Thunderbird Marine Products Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 592 cited R v McGregor (1977) 13 ALR 645 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate