Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NBKT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 195
MIGRATION - appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate - application for protection visa - whether Refugee Review Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in respect of provision of information to appellant - whether Tribunal asked wrong question or applied wrong test in considering claim of fear of persecution on religious grounds - whether Tribunal denied appellant procedural fairness having regard to the manner of examination of independent country information - lapse of time between entry into Australia and bringing of application for protection visa – consideration of s 91R(3)(b) – where appellant converted to Christianity while in Australia PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - leave to amend notice of appeal - whether respondents prejudiced by granting of leave - whether exceptional circumstances required to be shown by appellant - whether allowance to be granted by the Court to permit recently published judgments to be understood and applied by legal profession - grounds not raised before Federal Magistrate Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 91R(3)(b), 424A, 425 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
NBKT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FMCA 6 referred to SZDJQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 533 cited SZEEU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 150 FCR 214 followed VWBF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 851 cited VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168 cited Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 543 cited SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 215 ALR 162 cited Tin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 cited Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 396 cited VAF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 cited WAGP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 124 FCR 276 cited VWFP and VWFQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 231 cited NAZY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 87 ALD 357 discussed M55 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 131 cited SZERV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1221 cited SZCJD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 609 discussed SZHFC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1359 cited SZDPY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 627 cited Applicant NABD of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 216 ALR 1 cited S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 cited Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Abebe v The Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited SZANK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1478 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Lay Lat (2006) 151 FCR 212 cited SZCIJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 62 cited NAST v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1536 cited SBCC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 129 cited Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 548 cited NBKT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 344 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate