Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pantzer v Wenkart [2007] FCAFC 27
APPEALS – application to re-open appeals after final orders have been entered Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 referred to DJL v The Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 applied Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 referred to Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 referred to Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1993) 176 CLR 300 referred to WARREN PANTZER v THOMAS RICHARD WENKART, ANN SEXTON AND INSPECTOR GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY NSD 2457 OF 2005 WARREN PANTZER v THOMAS RICHARD WENKART, ANN SEXTON AND INSPECTOR GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY NSD 2459 OF 2005
BLACK CJ, RYAN AND MOORE JJ
13 March 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NSD 2457 OF 2005
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WARREN PANTZER
Appellant
AND: THOMAS RICHARD WENKART
First Respondent
ANN SEXTON
Second Respondent
INSPECTOR GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Third Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, RYAN AND MOORE JJ DATE OF ORDER: 13 March 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The motion on notice is refused. 2. The first respondent pay the appellant's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NSD 2459 OF 2005
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WARREN PANTZER
Appellant
AND: THOMAS RICHARD WENKART
First Respondent
ANN SEXTON
Second Respondent
INSPECTOR GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY
Third Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, RYAN AND MOORE JJ DATE OF ORDER: 13 March 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate