Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v JP Morgan Portfolio Services Limited (ACN 064 567 040) [2007] FCAFC 52 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for order of summary dismissal or permanent stay of proceedings – where party conducts litigation on behalf of another following sale of business – relevant factors in consideration of abuse of process – whether proceedings constitute abuse of process – whether proceedings instituted for an illegitimate purpose – appeal dismissed
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – s 23 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – s 82
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (No S530/2005) (2006) 227 ALR 425 cited Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 646 referred to Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 ALR 58 followed Clairs Keeley (A Firm) v Treacy (2003) 28 WAR 139 discussed Clairs Keeley (A Firm) v Treacy (2004) 29 WAR 479 discussed D'Orta Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1 considered Fischer v Kamala Naiker (1860) 8 Moo Ind App 170 cited Fostif Pty Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 203 referred to Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297 cited Giles v Thompson [1994] 1 AC 142 questioned Glegg v Bromley [1913] 3 KB 474 cited Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 referred to Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 referred to Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn (1977) 137 CLR 567 referred to In re judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CLR 257 cited McDermott v Black (1940) 63 CLR 161 referred to North Ganalanja Aboriginal Corporation v Queensland (1996) 185 CLR 595 cited Park v Allied Mortgage Corporation Limited (1993) 15 ATPR 46-105 referred to Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635 referred to Project 28 Pty Ltd (formerly Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd) v Barr [2005] NSWCA 240 cited Ram Coomar Coondoo v Chunder Canto Mookerjee (1876) 2 App Cas 186 cited Re McBain; Ex parte; Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372 cited Salomon v Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 referred to Sprye v Porter (1856) 7 E&B 58 referred to Stanley v Jones (1831) 7 Bing 369 referred to Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse [1982] AC 679 discussed Truth about Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited (2000) 200 CLR 591 referred to Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 referred to Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 referred to DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU, MOXLABIA PTY LTD (ACN 003 564 716), GREENWOOD CHALLONER & CO, ALLAN MARTIN DELANEY AND AM DELANEY NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 001 832 015) v JP MORGAN PORTFOLIO SERVICES LIMITED (ACN 064 567 040) NSD 2292 OF 2005 TAMBERLIN, JACOBSON & RARES JJ 16 APRIL 2007 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate