Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Pipeline Limited v Alinta Limited [2007] FCAFC 55
APPEAL – Corporations Law – appeal from single judge of the Federal Court of Australia – application for declaration of contravention of s 606 of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and consequential orders for relief including divestment of shareholding – whether first respondent as a matter of fact acquired a relevant interest in fifth respondent's securities in the appellant pursuant to a takeover bid and therefore made an acquisition exempted under s 611, Item 1 Corporations Act 2001 – whether first respondent subsequently acquired a relevant interest pursuant to s 608(1)(c) Corporations Act 2001 by entry into a Heads of Agreement by acquiring the power to dispose of or control the disposal of the relevant interest – whether by entry into the Heads of Agreement the first respondent acquired a relevant interest pursuant to s 608(8) of the Corporations Act 2001 by acquiring an enforceable right in relation to the securities – whether by entry into a Merger Implementation Agreement and other transaction implementation documents the fourth respondent acquired a relevant interest pursuant to s 608(1)(c) or s 608(8) of the Corporations Act 2001 – whether a declaration by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission modifying the effect of s 609(7) of the Corporations Act 2001 pursuant to s 655A of the Corporations Act 2001 operated to protect the first and second respondents from acquiring a relevant interest by subsequent on market acquisitions in the appellant.
Held (per Gyles and Lander JJ, Finkelstein J dissenting): On the evidence before the Court it could not be satisfied that before entering into the Heads of Agreement the first respondent did not have more than 20% interest in the fifth respondent by acceptances pursuant to the takeover bid and therefore a relevant interest in the fifth respondent's downstream interest in the appellant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate