Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFOH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 63
MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate dismissing appellant's application for constitutional writs in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – where appellant applied for protection visa – where application refused by delegate of Minister – where Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision – where appellant nominated authorised recipient pursuant to s 441G of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Tribunal sent letter in purported compliance with ss 425 and 425A of Migration Act to appellant in person and not to authorised recipient – whether giving of document to appellant sufficient to discharge Tribunal's obligations regarding invitation – whether breach of s 441G amounts to jurisdictional error. Held: s 441G creates obligation that Tribunal provide document to authorised recipient – provision of document to appellant in accordance with a method of service specified in s 441A not sufficient to comply with obligations in ss 425, 425A and 441G – failure to comply with obligation in s 425A amounts to jurisdictional error – appeal allowed. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 359, 379, 425, 426, 441 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 62 referred to Le v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 20 referred to Lo v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 553 referred to Makhu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 221 referred to NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 223 ALR 171 referred to Refugee Review Tribunal, Re; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 referred to SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 79 ALJR 1009 referred to Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 referred to VEAN of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 570 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate