Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Whitton as Trustee of the Estate of John Emmanuel Rose v Regis Towers Real Estate Pty Ltd (In Administration) [2007] FCAFC 125 BANKRUPTCY – whether person was about to become insolvent – insolvency not established merely by deficiency of assets over liabilities – liabilities included non-current interest bearing liabilities – no suggestion certain liabilities were due and payable – voluntary provision of unsecured funds. PROPERTY – transfer of new interest in property – when void as against trustee. DEBT – proof of debt – balancing journal entries in accounts – whether prima facie evidence of actual transactions – entries unreliable – accounts not supporting proof of debt – independent attempt to establish debt unsuccessful – case not proved. WORDS AND PHRASES – solvent – was about to become insolvent – transfer of property – property that did not previously exist.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 5, s 5(2), s 5(3), s 104, s 121(1), s 121(2), 121(9)(b) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 95A, s 1305 Peldan v Anderson(2006) 80 ALJR 1588; 229 ALR 432 Lewis v Doran (2005) 219 ALR 555 Lewis v Doran (2004) 184 FLR 454 Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666 Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 Ashton v Prentice [1998] FCA 1081 Ashton v Prentice [1998] FCA 1338 Ashton v Prentice [1998] FCA 1464 Ashton v Prentice [1998] FCA 1583 Re Jury; Ashton v Prentice (1999) 92 FCR 68 In the matter of Rose, A Bankrupt; Whitton v Regis Towers Real Estate Pty Ltd (In administration) [2006] FCA 1553 In the matter of Rose, a Bankrupt; Whitton v Regis Towers Real Estate Pty Ltd (In administration) (No 2) [2006] FCA 1734
ROBERT WILLIAM WHITTON AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN EMMANUEL ROSE, A BANKRUPT v REGIS TOWERS REAL ESTATE PTY LIMITED (IN ADMINISTRATION) and REGIS TOWERS REAL ESTATE PTY LIMITED (IN ADMINISTRATION) (Cross-Appellant) v ROBERT WILLIAM WHITTON AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN EMMANUEL ROSE, A BANKRUPT (Cross-Respondent) NSD 2392 OF 2006 REGIS TOWERS REAL ESTATE PTY LIMITED (IN ADMINISTRATION) v ROBERT WILLIAM WHITTON AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN EMMANUEL ROSE, A BANKRUPT NSD 2400 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate