Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Byrne v Repatriation Commission [2007] FCAFC 126
DEFENCE AND WAR – veterans' entitlements – whether death of war veteran was attributable to eligible war service – where hypothesis connecting the death with the circumstances of the service rendered is accepted as reasonable the AAT must adopt it as a finding unless it is disproved beyond reasonable doubt – possibility that veteran's coronary artery disease impaired his ability to survive in the water and contributed to drowning was not considered by AAT – AAT erred in law in rejecting hypothesis – appeal allowed – matter remitted to the AAT to reconsider hypothesis Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth),ss 8, 120, 120A, 120B, 196B
Byrne v Repatriation Commission [2006] FCA 1667 reversed Bull v Repatriation Commission (2001) 188 ALR 756referred to Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408cited Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 cited Collins v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2007] FCAFC 111 referred to Repatriation Commission v Codd [2007] FCA 877 referred to Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82referred to Repatriation Commission v Hancock (2003) 37 AAR 383 referred to Woodward v Repatriation Commission (2003) 131 FCR 473 referred to MARJORIE BYRNE v REPATRIATION COMMISSION NSD 55 OF 2007
GYLES, EDMONDS AND BUCHANAN JJ
13 august 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 55 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MARJORIE BYRNE
Appellant
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGES: GYLES, EDMONDS AND BUCHANAN JJ DATE OF ORDER: 13 august 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be allowed. 2. The orders made on 5 December 2006 in the primary proceeding be set aside. 3. In lieu thereof, the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be set aside and the matter be remitted to the Tribunal to be heard and determined according to law. 4. The respondent pay the costs of the appellant of the appeal and of the primary proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate