Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Epov v The Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 139
INCOME TAX – whether payments assessable as dividend paid on behalf of or for individual benefit of taxpayer – where taxpayer failed to discharge requisite onus of proof – validity of amended assessments – whether amended assessments invalid where issued prior to determination of objection proceedings commenced in relation to original assessments Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 44, 108, 170, 174 and 175A Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZO and 14ZV Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Jackson (1990) 27 FCR 1 referred to Fabry v Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 132 FCR 239 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 cited Hughes v Phillips (1948) 75 CLR 436 referred to Lonsdale Sand and Metal Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 81 FCR 419 cited Puzey v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 124 FCR 514 referred to St George Leagues Club Ltd v Commissioner of Land Tax [1983] 2 NSWLR 399 distinguished PETER EPOV v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA NSD 249 OF 2007
HEEREY, LINDGREN AND GORDON JJ
27 August 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 249 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: PETER EPOV
Appellant
AND: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGES: HEEREY, LINDGREN AND GORDON JJ DATE OF ORDER: 14 AUGUST 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate