Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fox v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2007] FCAFC 150
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Application for prerogative relief in relation to a decision of a Full Bench of the Industrial Relations Commission – Termination of employment – Where single Commissioner found termination to be valid – Where a Full Bench of the Industrial Relations Commission declined leave to appeal from the Commissioner's decision
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Procedural Fairness – Where lengthy delay between the hearing and delivery of the Commissioner's decision – Where case primarily based on issues of fact and concerns the credibility of a crucial witness – Where Commissioner provided no explanation for the delay having occurred or the means by which he refreshed his memory when making a determination on the credibility of the applicant's oral evidence – Where the Full Bench held that any denial of procedural fairness to the applicant could not have affected the outcome of the case – Where Full Bench did not rule on or consider the arguments advanced in support of the procedural fairness ground – Whether the approach of the Full Bench to the delay issue constitutes jurisdictional error
Held – The Full Bench committed jurisdictional error – This was not a case where a denial of procedural fairness could have made no difference to the outcome of the trial – The matter be remitted to the Full Bench for a hearing and determination according to law
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 108, 145, 170, 170CE, 170CG, 170JF Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 44 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44
Cobham v Frett [2001] WLR 1775 referred to Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194 considered Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 discussed Expectation Pty Ltd v PRD Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 140 FCR 17 referred to Linett v McIntyre (2002) 117 FCR 189 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to NAIS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 80 ALJR 367 considered Public Service Association (SA) v Federated Clerks' Union (1991) 173 CLR 132 referred to Re Australian Railways Union; ex parte Public Transport Corporation (1993) 117 ALR 17 referred to R v Ludeke; ex parte Customs Officers' Association of Australia (1985) 155 CLR 513 referred to SBAB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 161 referred to Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate