Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment & Workplace Relations [2007] FCAFC 174
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of decisions of Social Security Appeals Tribunal and Administrative Appeals Tribunal – finding by Administrative Appeals Tribunal that appellant's application before it was frivolous and vexatious – allegation of fraud on part of respondent – preclusion of appellant from re-litigating matters under Anshun principle Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 42B(1) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), ss 17, 1165 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 followed Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2006] FCA 1381 affirmed Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 approved MOHINDER SINGH v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS VID 1217 OF 2006
DOWSETT, SIOPIS AND MIDDLETON JJ
22 NOVEMBER 2007
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1217 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MOHINDER SINGH
Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
Respondent
JUDGES: DOWSETT, SIOPIS AND MIDDLETON JJ DATE OF ORDER: 22 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 1217 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MOHINDER SINGH
Appellant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
Respondent
JUDGES: DOWSETT, SIOPIS AND MIDDLETON JJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate