Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission [2007] FCAFC 183
ESTOPPEL – Anshun estoppel – where previous litigation in relation to lawfulness of the seizure and copying of a hard drive pursuant to a warrant issued under s 3E of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – where present application concerns right to obtain a copy of seized material pursuant to s 3N of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – whether unreasonable not to have pursued present claim in the previous proceeding – whether claim could have been raised in previous proceeding – whether present application arises out of substantially the same facts as previous application – whether risk of inconsistent judgments – whether special circumstances justifying decision not to stay present proceeding PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal – leave to appeal – section 24(1A) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether judgment dismissing or staying proceeding on ground of Anshun estoppel interlocutory or final Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission [2006] FCA 819 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 applied Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; 67 ER 313 cited Wong v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 146 FCR 10 cited BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 221 cited Daniel v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 21 cited Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs 132 FCR 222 cited Gibbs v Kinna (1999) 2 VR 19 followed Bazos v Doman [2001] NSWCA 347 applied Boles v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 666 cited Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual Life Association (1996) 40 NSWLR 543 cited Redowood Pty Ltd v Link Market Services Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 286 cited Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 cited Ling v Commonwealth (1996) 68 FCR 180 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [No 1] (1980) 147 CLR 35 applied Tampion v Anderson (1973) 3 ALR 414 distinguished Re Luck (2003) 203 ALR 1 distinguished MZWHW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 466 cited SZEEO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 546 cited NADZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 975 cited SBFF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 158 FCR 49 cited S1000 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 285 disapproved SZDEG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 748 disapproved SYWB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 402 disapproved Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 referred to PHILIP EGGLISHAW v AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION VID 614 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate