Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Probiotec Limited v The University of Melbourne [2008] FCAFC 5
COSTS – Appeal from decision of a single judge – discretion to award costs under s 43(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – factors in exercise of discretion – where respondents to claim of unjustified threats brought cross-claim for infringement of patents – where new parties joined much later as respondents to cross-claim – where cross-claim not actively defended by newly joined cross-respondents – where defence of inactive cross-respondents denied infringement and validity of patent – where cross-claimants successful against all cross-respondents – where active and inactive cross-respondents made liable jointly and severally for cross-claimant's costs – where primary judge held it to be settled law that liability for payment of costs order ordinarily joint and several – where primary judge considered whether inactive cross-respondents raised a separate and distinct defence – whether inactive cross-respondents submitting parties – whether exercise of discretion to award costs miscarried
Held: inactive cross-respondents not submitting parties in circumstances – discretion to award costs pursuant to s 43(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) is broad – no automatic rules for exercise of discretion – need for order to be just in circumstances of particular case – lack of separate and distinct defence not determinative of whether liability for payment of costs order should be joint and several – exercise of discretion miscarried – no sufficient basis for making inactive cross-claimants liable for costs of proceedings in period prior to their joinder – defence of inactive cross-respondents – cross-claimants had to prove case in greater detail in any event because of stance of active cross-respondents – appeal allowed – liability of inactive cross-respondents to pay costs reduced to 10 percent on joint and several basis with active cross-respondents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate