Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy [2008] FCAFC 7 APPEALS – consent orders – order allowing appeal by consent – whether demonstrated error by primary judge condition of power to allow appeal – effect of agreement by legally represented parties – appeal by way of rehearing – need to demonstrate error PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery – consent orders – whether within power and appropriate – conditions of exercise of power to order preliminary discovery – production of documents relating to application for substantial funding for establishment of broadband network to regional and under-served areas of Australia – whether arguably infected by want of procedural fairness – nature of relief sought – legal and factual uncertainties – effect of agreement between parties – consent order made Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B), s 27, s 28 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 15A
Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172 cited Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 391 cited Austrac Operations Pty Ltd v New South Wales (2003) ATPR 41-960 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 161 ALR 79 cited Barnett v Minister of Housing and Aged Care (1991) 31 FCR 400 cited CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 cited Century Metals and Mining NL v Yeomans (1989) 40 FCR 564 cited C7 Pty Ltd v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1864 cited East Grace Corporation v Xing (No 2) [2005] FCA 1266 cited Ex-Christmas Islanders Assn Inc v Attorney-General (Cth) (20005) 149 FCR 170 cited Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Ltd (recs and mgrs apptd) (2005) 223 ALR 238 cited Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1 cited Matrix Film Investment One Pty Limited v Alameda Films LLC [2006] FCA 591 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Kwan [2002] FCAFC 380 cited Moses v Western Australia(2007) 160 FCR 148 cited Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 2065 cited Re Coldham; Ex parte Brideson (No 2) (1990) 170 CLR 267 cited St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 147 cited Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (No 3) [2007] FCA 1567 cited Thomson Australian Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150 cited VTAG v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 141 FCR 291 cited TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED ABN 33 051 775 556 v MINISTER FOR BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA NSD 2069 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate