Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd [2008] FCAFC 38 LANDLORD AND TENANT – covenant not to alter demised premises – covenant to leave in repair or make good demised premises at end of term of lease DAMAGES – lease – breach of covenant not to alter demised premises – measure of damages – no damage to reversion – whether cost of reinstatement recoverable – whether reinstatement is reasonable – meaning of reasonable – time at which claim is made by landlord – at or near end of lease – relevance of option to renew – relevance of whether option exercised – whether landlord must prove intention to use any damages awarded to restore premises – rule in Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31
Abrahams v Shaw (1969) 72 SR (NSW) 225 cited Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar [1924] 1 KB 716 cited Atkins (GW) Ltd v Scott (1991) 7 Construction Law Journal 215 approved Barton v Reilly (1878) 1 SCR (NS) NSW 125 cited Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 discussed Birch v Clifford (1891) 8 TLR 103 cited Black Creek Deer Farm Pty Ltd v ANZ (1996) V ConvR ¶54-549 referred to British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 referred to CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 applied Chan v Cresdon Pty Ltd (1989) 168 CLR 242 cited Commonwealth v Antonio Giorgio Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 51 cited Conquest v Ebbetts [1896] AC 490 discussed De Cesare v Deluxe Motors Pty Limited (1996) 67 SASR 28 cited Director of War Service and Homes v Harris [1968] Qd R 275 referred to Espir v Basil Street Hotel Ltd [1936] 3 All ER 91 cited Evans v Balog [1976] 1 NSWLR 36 distinguished Eyre v Rea [1947] KB 567 discussed Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 cited Gange v Lockwood (1860) 2 F & F 115 [175 ER 984] cited Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 395 cited Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 1 cited Gooderham and Worts Ltd v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation [1947] AC 66 cited Graham v Markets Hotel Pty Ltd (1943) 67 CLR 567 followed Hanson v Newman [1934] Ch 298 cited Hill v Barclay (1810) 16 Ves Jun 402 [33 ER 1037] considered Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wilh Wilhemsen Agency Pty Limited [2001] NSWCA 313 discussed Jacob & Youngs Inc v Kent 230 NY 239; 129 NE 889 (1921)cited James v Hutton and J Cook & Sons Ltd [1950] 1 KB 9 discussed Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31 followed Lambert v F W Woolworth and Co Ltd [1938] Ch 883 discussed Lurcott v Wakely & Wheeler [1911] 1 KB 905 cited Maggbury Pty Limited v Hafele Australia Pty Limited (2001) 210 CLR 181 referred to Maori Trustee v Rogross Farm Ltd [1994] 3 NZLR 410 referred to Parramatta City Council v Lutz (1988) 12 NSWLR 293 referred to Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 17 cited Proudfoot v Hart (1890) 25 QBD 42 referred to Radford v De Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262 approved Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd [1999] Ch 64 discussed Rawlings v Morgan (1865) 18 CB (NS) 776 cited Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 186 ALR 289 at 293; 76 ALJR 436 referred to Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] AC 344 applied Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634 cited Scott Carver v SAS Trustee Corporation [2005] NSWCA 462 cited Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding [1973] AC 691 cited Terroni v Corsini [1931] 1 Ch 515 cited Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106 cited Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 cited Turner v Lamb (1845) 14 M & W 412[153 ER 535] cited UI International Pty Ltd v Interworks Architects Pty Ltd [2007] QCA 402 discussed Westpoint Management Ltd v Chocolate Factory Apartments Ltd [2007] NSWCA 253 referred to Whitham v Kershaw (1885) 16 QBD 613 discussed Wincant Pty Limited v South Australia (1977) 69 SASR 126 cited Woods v Pope (1835) 6 Car & P 782 [172 ER 1461] cited Yates v Dunster (1855) 11 Exch 15 [156 ER 726] cited Zhu v Treasurer of New South Wales (2004) 218 CLR 530 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate