Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Repatriation Commission v Warren [2008] FCAFC 64
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) was entitled to rely on concession made by Repatriation Commission – true meaning and effect of concession – concession made that evidence satisfied all criteria but one for veteran's entitlement to pension and that Tribunal need concern itself only with that one Held: Tribunal entitled to act on concession, and no error of law in failing to satisfy itself independently that the other criteria were satisfied
VETERAN'S AFFAIRS – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) was entitled to rely on concession made by Repatriation Commission – true meaning and effect of concession – concession made that evidence satisfied all criteria but one for veteran's entitlement to pension and that Tribunal need concern itself only with that one Held: Tribunal entitled to act on concession, and no error of law in failing to satisfy itself independently that the other criteria were satisfied
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 5D, 9(1), 13(1), 120, 120A, 196B
Bird v Commonwealth of Australia (1988) 165 CLR 1 cited Budworth v Repatriation Commission (2001) 63 ALD 422 cited Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 cited Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 cited Comcare v Fiedler (2001) 115 FCR 328 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Perkins (1993) 26 ATR 8 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Raptis (1989) 20 ATR 1262 cited Ferriday v Repatriation Commission (1996) 69 FCR 521 followed Grant v Repatriation Commission (1999) 57 ALD 1 cited Kim v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 38 AAR 304 cited Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 35 ALR 186considered Lodowski v Comcare (1998) 53 ALD 371 cited Peacock v Repatriation Commission [2007] FCAFC 156 cited Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 discussed Repatriation Commission v Gosewinckel (1999) 59 ALD 690considered Repatriation Commission v Law (1981) 147 CLR 635 cited Repatriation Commission v Warren [2006] FCA 866 considered Stafford v Repatriation Commission (1995) 56 FCR 121cited Tefonu Pty Ltd v Insurance and Superannuation Commissioner (1993) 44 FCR 361 cited Thomas v Repatriation Commission (1994) 50 FCR 112 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate