Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pelka v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services & Indigenous Affairs [2008] FCAFC 92
SOCIAL SECURITY – member of a couple – marriage-like relationship - whether decision maker is required to make a finding of fact in relation to the relevant consideration of whether a sexual relationship existed – whether the commitment of a relationship compared to other relationships in the person's life was an irrelevant consideration – whether sufficient evidence to make findings about the comparative commitment of the relationship – whether denial of procedural fairness
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 4 Davis v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 686 cited MEE CHIN PELKA v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
WAD 214 OF 2007
SUNDBERG, EMMETT AND SIOPIS JJ
30 may 2008
PERTH IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 214 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY DEPUTY PRESIDENT SD HOTOP AND MEMBER L TOVEY
BETWEEN: MEE CHIN PELKA
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGES: SUNDBERG, EMMETT AND SIOPIS JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 30 may 2008
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAD 214 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY DEPUTY PRESIDENT SD HOTOP AND MEMBER L TOVEY
BETWEEN: MEE CHIN PELKA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate