Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dent v Australian Electoral Commissioner [2008] FCAFC 111
ELECTIONS – electoral Roll – whether a person registered as an itinerant elector under s 96 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1981 (Cth) may be eligible to make a request under s 104 that that person's address not be shown on the electoral Roll
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1981 (Cth) ss 57, 83, 90A, 90B, 93A, 96, 101, 102, 104, 166, 184A, 387 Electoral and Referendum Regulations 1940 (Cth), reg 12(1), 12(2) Howard v Australian Electoral Commission [2000] FCA 1767 cited Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 applied QAAH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 9 applied Peczalski v Comcare (1999) 58 ALD 697 cited Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 cited ARTHUR DENT v AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER and DARYL WIGHT
VID 52 of 2008 VID 269 of 2008 VID 271 of 2008
FRENCH, TAMBERLIN & MANSFIELD JJ
19 JUNE 2008
ADELAIDE (HEARD IN MELBOURNE) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 52 of 2008 VID 269 of 2008 VID 271 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ARTHUR DENT
Appellant/Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER
First Respondent
DARYL WIGHT
Second Respondent
JUDGES: FRENCH, TAMBERLIN & MANSFIELD JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 19 JUNE 2008
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE (HEARD IN MELBOURNE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal from the orders of the Court made on 14 December 2007 be dismissed. 2. The application for an extension of time within which to appeal from the costs order made by the Court on 1 November 2007 be refused. 3. The application for an extension of time within which to appeal from the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 23 November 2007 is granted, limited to the issue as to whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law in deciding that the applicant, having been enrolled on the Roll in the name Arthur Langer under s 96 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1981 (Cth), was not eligible to make a request under s 104 of that Act for his address not to be shown on the Roll and time to institute the appeal is extended to 19 June 2008. 4. The appeal on the issue identified in Order 3 hereof be heard instanter and the appeal be taken to have been instituted by the document entitled "Notice of Appeal" filed on 25 January 2008 with effect from 19 June 2008, subject to: (a) the first and second respondents within 14 days may make such further written submissions in answer to the applicant's submissions on the issue as they may be advised; (b) the applicant within a further 14 days may make such written submissions in reply to any such further submissions of the respondents as he may be advised; and judgment on the appeal referred to in Orders 3 and 4 hereof is otherwise reserved. 5. The first and second respondents within 14 days may make such written submissions on the costs of the appeal and of the applications as they may be advised. 6. The applicant may within a further 14 days make such written submissions on the costs of the appeal and of the applications as he may be advised. 7. The costs of the appeal and of the two applications and of the appeal for which leave has been given by Order 3 hereof be reserved to the date when judgment on the appeal referred to in Orders 3 and 4 hereof is otherwise reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate