Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Manolakis v District Registrar, South Australia District Registry, Federal Court of Australia [2008] FCAFC 162
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – filing of documents - document containing scandalous and vexatious material - allegations about non-parties - direction of judge to registrar to refuse to accept document for filing - whether decision of registrar or direction of judge amenable to judicial review - whether primary judge correct in upholding decision to refuse to accept document for filing
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Federal Court Rules O 46 r 7A Bahonko v Sterjov [2007] FCA 1556 cited Bahonko v Sterjov [2007] FCA 1717 cited Bienstein v Family Court of Australia [2008] FCA 1138 cited Bizuneh v Randwick City Council [2005] FCA 369followed Gunter v Doogan [1999] FCA 1648 considered Letts v Commonwealth (1985) 8 FCR 585 not followed Manolakis v Leonard [2008] FCA 929considered Paramasivam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 128 FCR 353 cited Legal Aid Commission of Western Australia v Edwards (1982) 42 ALR 154considered
ANASTASIOS MANOLAKIS v DISTRICT REGISTRAR, SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA, JAN LEONARD T/AS OG SPEED SHOP and LEN LEONARD T/AS OG SPEED SHOP
SAD 86 of 2008
GRAY, BRANSON AND BESANKO JJ
11 SEPTEMBER 2008
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 86 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ANASTASIOS MANOLAKIS
Appellant
AND: DISTRICT REGISTRAR, SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
JAN LEONARD T/AS OG SPEED SHOP
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate