Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Elwood Clothing Pty Ltd v Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 197
COPYRIGHT – original artistic work – T-shirt with design comprising words, numerals and logo arranged in a distinctive manner to suggest USA college sporting team – also an associated "swing tag" – whether the designs were drawings and therefore artistic works – whether they were literary works because of presence of words and numerals – distinction between literary works and artistic works – copying admitted – whether respondent had taken only underlying idea rather than expression – idea/expression dichotomy – layout giving particular "look and feel" as artistic element – whether respondent had taken a substantial part of applicant's work by taking layout giving rise to the look and feel. Held: (1) both T-shirt and swing tag were drawings and therefore artistic works, not literary works; (2) by taking layout giving rise to look and feel, respondent had taken original artistic element, and therefore a substantial part of the artistic work. Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10(1), 32, 202 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1)(a), 27
Anacon Corporation Ltd v Environmental Research Technology Ltd [1994] FSR 659 cited Aubrey Max Sandman v Panasonic UK Ltd [1998] FSR 651 cited Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 applied Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 cited CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena (2006) 224 ALR 1 cited Data Access Corporation v Powerflex Services Pty Ltd (1999) 202 CLR 1 applied Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] FSR 121 cited Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] WLR 2416 applied Dorling v Honnor Marine Ltd [1965] Ch 1 cited Electronic Techniques (Anglia) Ltd v Critchley Components Ltd [1997] FSR 401 cited Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 cited Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 cited Knitwaves Inc v Lollytogs Ltd (Inc) 71 F3d 996 (2d Cir 1995) cited Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 277 applied L B (Plastics) Ltd v Swish Products Ltd [1979] RPC 551 cited Lott v JBW & Friends Pty Ltd (2000) 76 SASR 105 cited Metricon Homes Pty Ltd v Barrett Property Group Pty Ltd (2008) 75 IPR 455 applied Millar & Lang Ltd v Polak [1908] 1 Ch 433 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia (2001) 205 CLR 507 applied Roland Corporation v Lorenzo & Sons Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 111 cited Roth Greeting Cards v United Card Co 429 F2d 1106 (9th Cir 1970) cited Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions v McDonald's Corp 562 F2d 1157 (9th Cir 1977) cited S W Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1985) 159 CLR 466 cited Woodtree Pty Ltd v Zheng (2007) 164 FCR 369 applied Goldstein on Copyright (Aspen Publishers, 3rd ed) Vol 1 Nimmer On Copyright (LexisNexis, looseleaf) Vol 4 ELWOOD CLOTHING PTY LTD (ACN 079 393 696) v COTTON ON CLOTHING PTY LTD (ACN 052 130 462)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate