Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited [2009] FCAFC 8
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – apprehended bias – judgment overturned on appeal on a question of the exclusion of certain evidence – proceeding remitted to and heard by the same trial judge – comments made in the original judgment about the policy of evidence law and relevance of evidence the subject of the appeal – evidence now admitted – same substantive verdict on retrial – whether a properly informed lay observer, looking objectively at the circumstances in which the proceeding was remitted to the primary judge, might reasonably apprehend that the primary judge might not bring an impartial and unbiased mind to the resolution of the dispute between the parties
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 76, 79, 80, 135 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 28 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52, s 53
Australian Woollen Mills Limited v FS Walton & Co Limited (1937) 58 CLR 641 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Basemount Pty Limited & Anor (2003) 126 LGERA 339 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (2006) 228 ALR 719 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (2006) 229 ALR 136 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (2007) 159 FCR 397 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] ATPR 42-175 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (No 5) (2007) 240 ALR 780 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (No. 8) (2008) 75 IPR 557 Concrete Pty Limited v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Limited (2006) 229 CLR 577 Cat Media Pty Limited v Opti‑Healthcare Pty Limited [2003] ASAL 55-103 Domain Names Australia Pty Limited v .au Domain Administration Limited (2004) 139 FCR 215 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Expectation Pty Limited v PRD Realty Pty Limited & Anor (No. 2) (2006) 151 FCR 160 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Livesey v The New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Qantas Airways Limited [2004] ACompT9 R v Turner [1975] QB 834 Southern Equities Corp Limited (in liq) v Bond (2000) 78 SASR 339 Transport Publishing Co Pty Limited v The Literature Board of Review (1956) 99 CLR 111 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568 Vakauta v Kelly (1988) 13 NSWLR 502
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate