Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Momentum Productions Pty Limited v Lewarne [2009] FCAFC 30
PARTNERSHIP – Statutory definition of – Requirement of carrying on business in common – What constitutes – Necessity for mutuality – Whether necessary for persons to be agents of each other – Payment of capital sum by co-participant in proposed business – Whether capital contribution to partnership or loan to business principal – Agreement to share profits – Whether sufficient to sustain proposition of partnership – Whether discounted by other factors. PARTNERSHIP – Existence of – Intention of parties – Whether all had agreed to share in losses as well as profits – Whether necessity for symmetry in putative partners' contributions – Whether all partners need to have rights to participate in management of business, including in decisions on admission of new partners. PARTNERSHIP – Managing partner operating through service company – Whether company a partner as such – Whether company held assets and operated business as a trustee. PARTNERSHIP – Managing partner receiving capital contribution from another partner and using it to discharge mortgage over property of which former became registered proprietor – Use of property as security for loans made to partnership business – Whether breach of fiduciary obligation by managing partner – Whether obliged to account to other partner for the amount of capital contribution. PARTNERSHIP – Partner with de factor control over partnership assets using them for own purpose in breach of fiduciary duty – Duty to account – Whether this made him a debtor to himself. PERSONAL PROPERTY – Valuation – Pending court proceedings seeking compensation for damage to business – Whether an asset of business – Whether value could be placed on pending proceedings. EQUITY – Managing partner receiving capital contribution from another partner and using it to discharge mortgage over property of which former became registered proprietor – Use of property as security for loans made to partnership business – Whether breach of fiduciary obligation by managing partner – Whether obliged to account to other partner for the amount of capital contribution. Partnership Act 1892 (NSW) ss 1(1), 2(1), 24(1), 26, 31(1), 32, 44(b) Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) 81 FCR 149, 172 Brambles Holdings Limited v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Cox v Hickman (1860) 8 HL Cas 268 De Tastet v Shaw (1818) 1 B & Ald 664 (106 ER 244) Duke Group Limited (in liq) v Pilmer (1999) 153 FLR 1 Green v Hertzog [1954] 1 WLR 1309 Holme v Hammond (1872) LR 7 Ex 218 Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 International Harvester Company of Australia Pty Ltd v Carrigan's Hazeldene Pastoral Company (1958) 100 CLR 644 Lang v James Morrison & Company Limited (1911) 13 CLR 1 Richardson v The Bank of England (1838) 4 My & Cr 165 (41 ER 165) Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited v Ken Morgan Motors (1994) 2 VR 106 I'Anson Banks, RC, Lindley & Banks on Partnership, 18th Ed., 2002 MOMENTUM PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED and RICHARD JAMES SCOTTS v RICHARD JOHN LEWARNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate