Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 32
PRIVILEGE – Legal professional privilege – Litigation privilege – Finalised proofs of evidence – Whether litigation privilege exists where documents created for purpose of providing to opposing party and in fact so provided PRIVILEGE – Legal professional privilege – Litigation privilege – Waiver of privilege – Whether filing and service, without more, of finalised proofs of evidence constitutes waiver of privilege
PRIVILEGE – Legal professional privilege – Litigation privilege – Distinction between privilege and implied undertaking
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether leave to appeal against interlocutory ruling ought to be granted – Case raises a matter of public importance – Possible loss of substantive right – Leave granted
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeal – Issue not taken below – When allowed to be raised on appeal – When in interests of justice – Issue concerns substantive right – Party repudiating stance adopted at trial – No prejudice to opposing party – In interests of justice to allow
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 122 Federal Court Rules (Cth), O 46 r 6
Akins v Abigroup Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 539 cited AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2004] FCA 1196 cited Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 applied Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 678 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2000) 96 FCR 317 cited Australian Medic-Care Co Ltd v Hamilton Pharmaceutical Pty Limited (No 3) [2008] FCA 976 cited Austress Freyssinet Pty Ltd v Marlin International Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 958 cited AWB Ltd v Cole (2006) 152 FCR 382 cited Black & Decker Inc v Flymo Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 753 cited British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (No 2) (2003) 8 VR 571 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Amcor Limited [2008] FCA 88 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Amcor Limited [2008] FCA 398 cited Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Neate (1998) 144 FLR 373 cited Churche v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (No 3) [2006] FCA 1168 cited Comfort Hotels Ltd v Wembley Stadium Ltd[1988] 1 WLR 872 cited Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 cited Commissioner of Patents v Sherman [2008] FCAFC 182 cited Complete Technology Pty Ltd v Toshiba (Australia) Pty Ltd (1994) 53 FCR 125 considered Dingle v Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia (1989) 23 FCR 63 cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 cited Fairfield-Mabey Ltd v Shell UK Metallurgical Testing Services (Scotland) Ltd [1989] 1 All ER 576 cited Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 cited Goldberg v Ng (1995)185 CLR 83 cited GSA Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd v Constable [2002] 2 Qd R 146 cited Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 cited Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 cited In the Marriage of Crowe(1988) 12 Fam LR 696cited Leaders Shoes (Aust) Pty Ltd v National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd [1968] 1 NSWR 344 cited Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd (2005) 218 ALR 283 considered Li Pei Ye v Crown Ltd [2004] FCAFC 8 cited Mann v Carnell (1999)201 CLR 1 followed Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 cited Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 cited Nagan v Holloway [1996] 1 Qd R 607 cited National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd v Waind (1979) 141 CLR 648 cited Nilsen Industrial Electronics Pty Ltd v National Semiconductor Corporation (1994) 48 FCR 337 cited Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (2008) 234 CLR 275 cited Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435 cited Polyaire Pty Ltd v K-Aire Pty Ltd (2003) 226 LSJS 109 cited Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 cited Public Transport Authority of Western Australia v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (2007) 34 WAR 279 cited Sevic v Roarty (1998) 44 NSWLR 287 cited Southern Equities Corporation Ltd v West Australian Government Holdings Ltd (1993) 10 WAR 1 cited Spotless Group Ltd v Premier Building and Consulting Group Pty Ltd (2006)16 VR 1 cited State Bank of South Australia v Smoothdale (No 2) Limited (1995) 64 SASR 224 not followed State of New South Wales v Jackson (2007) NSWCA 279 cited Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 Ch D 675 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate