Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Irwin v Military Rehabilitation & Compensation Commission [2009] FCAFC 33 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in reviewing a decision of the Military Rehabilitation Compensation Commission may determine a claim for compensation once satisfied the Commission is liable for a "service injury", even though the Commission has found no liability and not assessed compensation ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of the competency of an appeal – consideration of s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – consideration of s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – consideration of whether the present appeal lies from the effective determination of the application for review – consideration of whether the Tribunal proceeding is capable of being divided into separate parts giving rise to several independent "decisions" – consideration of the scope of s 319 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an exercise of judicial power in setting aside an exercise of executive power – limitations on the power to set aside by consent – consideration of the need for the Court to address a contended error of law for itself Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth), ss 23, 68, 319, 333, 349, 353 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5 Director-General of Social Services v Chaney (1980) 31 ALR 571 - cited Australian Securities and Investments Commission v PTLZ [2008] FCAFC 164 - cited Repatriation Commission v Stafford (1995) 56 FCR 132 - cited Kovalev v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 100 FCR 323; [1999] FCA 557 – cited and quoted Sanchez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 265 - cited Xiao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 109 FCR 129; [2001] FCA 459 - cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Villa (2001) 115 FCR 16; [2001] FCA 1175 - cited Yulianti v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 142 – cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Gungor (1982) 42 ALR 209 - cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (2000) 199 CLR 343 – cited and quoted Re Paul Fuad and Telstra Corporation Limited (2004) 39 AAR 496 – cited Lees v Comcare (1999) 56 ALD 84 – cited and distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate