Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bamford v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 66
TAXATION – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 97(1) – "that share of the net income of a trust estate" –meaning of "share"– whether "share" can, in certain circumstances, refer to an amount rather than a proportion – disparity between net income and distributable income TAXATION – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 97(1) – "income of a trust estate" –meaning of "income of trust estate" – whether capital receipts deemed income by trust deed are income for the purposes of income tax assessment – whether present entitlement to income Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 95, 97(1), 98, 99, 99A, 101 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 115-215(2)
Cajkusic v Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 155 FCR 430 discussed Commissioner of Taxation v Australian and New Zealand Savings Bank Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 328 considered Commissioner of Taxation v Montgomery (1999) 198 CLR 639 applied Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Commercial Nominees of Australia Limited (1999) 167 ALR 147 approved Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Harmer (1990) 24 FCR 237 approved Richardson v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 187 ALR 680 applied Scott v Commissioner of Taxation (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 215 cited Tindal v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 608 approved Zeta Force Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 84 FCR 70 applied PHILLIP BAMFORD & ORS v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
NSD 700 of 2008
EMMETT, STONE & PERRAM JJ
3 JUNE 2009
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 700 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: PHILLIP BAMFORD
First Applicant
DAVINA BAMFORD
Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate