Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2009] FCAFC 111 EXTRADITION — extradition sought of Serbian to the Republic of Croatia — extradition opposed on basis of an extradition objection — prejudice claimed 'at trial' — punished or detained — a mitigating factor in sentence unavailable to the person by reason of political opinions — reliance upon statistics as to numbers of persons charged and convicted and conviction rates Held: Appeal allowed WORDS AND PHRASES — an 'extradition objection' — 'substantial grounds for believing' — 'punished' — at trial — 'by reason of' — 'political opinions' Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 3(a), 7, 19, 21 Extradition (Croatia) Regulations 2004 (Cth) reg 4 Extradition (Croatia) Regulations 2004 Statutory Rules 2004 No. 339 (Cth) Explanatory Statement Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, applied In re Arton [1896] 1 QB 108, cited Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514, cited Brown v Lizars (1905) 2 CLR 837, cited Cabal v United Mexican States (2001) 108 FCR 311, applied Cabal v United Mexican States (No 2) (2000) 172 ALR 743, applied Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) (2000) 186 ALR 188, cited De Bruyn v Republic of South Africa (1999) 96 FCR 290, cited Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Kainhofer (1995) 185 CLR 528, cited DJL v The Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226, applied Harris v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (1994) 52 FCR 386, cited Hempel v Attorney-General (Cth) (1987) 77 ALR 641, cited O'Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCA 618, cited Prabowo v Republic of Indonesia (1995) 61 FCR 258, cited Rahardja v Republic of Indonesia [2000] FCA 1297, considered Schlieske v Federal Republic of Germany (1987) 14 FCR 424, cited Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2009] FCA 30, reversed Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518, cited Travica v The Government of Croatia [2004] EWHC 2747 (Admin), considered Vasiljkovic v The Commonwealth of Australia (2006) 227 CLR 614, applied Aughterson EP, Extradition – Australian Law and Procedure (The Law Book Company Limited, 1995) Nicholls C, Montgomery C and Knowles JB, The Law of Extradition and Mutual Assistance (2nd ed, Oxford University Press, 2007) DANIEL SNEDDEN v REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate