Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2009] FCAFC 159
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to raise a new point on appeal that could possibly have been met by calling evidence below – application refused University of Wollongong v Metwally (No. 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Water Board v Moustakas (1987) 180 CLR 491 Banque Commerciale SA, En Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 Tyson v Brisbane Market Freight Brokers Proprietary Limited (1994) 68 ALJR 304 Hampton Court Limited v Crooks (1957) 97 CLR 367 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 1 NSWLR 1 FAWZY IBRAHIM SOLIMAN v UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY
NSD 1705 of 2008
GRAHAM, LOGAN AND FLICK JJ
4 NOVEMBER 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
FAIR WORK DIVISION NSD 1705 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FAWZY IBRAHIM SOLIMAN
Appellant
AND: UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY
Respondent
JUDGES: GRAHAM, LOGAN AND FLICK JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 4 NOVEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1. Orders that leave be granted to the appellant to file a Further Amended Notice of Appeal containing Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 5 as set out in the draft Further Amended Notice of Appeal, lodged by the appellant with the appellant's Outline of Submissions dated 29 October 2009. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
FAIR WORK DIVISION NSD 1705 of 2008
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FAWZY IBRAHIM SOLIMAN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate