Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2010] FCAFC 10 Citation: Kowalski v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2010] FCAFC 10
Appeal from: Kowalski v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2009] AATA 38
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION COMMISSION
File number: SAD 15 of 2009
Judges: MARSHALL, TRACEY AND FOSTER JJ
Date of judgment: 22 February 2010
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Where decision of the AAT affirmed the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission's decision not to grant compensation/benefits – Where notice of appeal contains no pure questions of law – Application of Part X of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – Whether the Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 (Cth) applies to injuries/diseases suffered after 1 December 1988 – Whether s 39 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) imposes a duty on the Tribunal to accord procedural fairness – Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the appellant – No denial of procedural fairness – Appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 39, 44, 44(1) Commonwealth Employees' Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 139 Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 (Cth) s 39 Federal Court Rules O 53 r 3(2)(b) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 4, 5B, 7(4), 14, 62, 124, 124(1), 124(1A), 124(2), 139 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 (Cth) Schedule 1 Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate