Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26 Citation: Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26
Appeal from: Sampi v State of Western Australia[2005] FCA 1716
Parties: PAUL SAMPI AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE BARDI AND JAWI PEOPLEv STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA and COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and WESTERN AUSTRALIAN FISHING INDUSTRY COUNCIL and B & L BROWN AND BLUE SEAS PEARLING COMPANY
File number: WAD 188 of 2006
Judges: NORTH & MANSFIELD JJ
Date of judgment: 18 March 2010
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – native title determination application – recognition of native title – principles – Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – native title claim group – whether one or two societies at sovereignty – whether there has been continuity and evolutionary change post-sovereignty – extent of rights and interests to land and water – offshore areas – intertidal zone – right to protect
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakay Native Title Claim Group v Northern Territory of Australia(2004) 207 ALR 539; [2004] FCA 472 Attorney General (NT) v Ward (2003) 134 FCR 16; [2003] FCAFC 283 Branir v Owston Nominees (No. 2) (2001) 117 FCR 424; [2001] FCA 1835 Brown v State of Western Australia [2001] FCA 1462 Daniel v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 536 De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290; [2005] FCAFC 110 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Gawirrin Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2) [2005] FCA 1425 Gumana v Northern Territory (2005) 141 FCR 457; [2005] FCA 50 Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2) [2005] FCA 1425 Hayes v Northern Territory [2000] FCA 671 James v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1208 King v Northern Territory of Australia (2007) 162 FCR 89; [2007] FCA 944 The Lardil Peoples v State of Queensland [2004] FCA 298 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422; [2002] HCA 58 Manas v State of Queensland [2006] FCA 412 Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402 Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 1092 The Ngalakan People v Northern Territory of Australia (O'Loughlin J, 7 February 2002) Ngalpil v State of Western Australia [2001] FCA 1140 Nangkiriny v State of Western Australia(2002) 117 FCR 6; [2002] FCA 660 Nona v State of Queensland [2005] FCA 1118 Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group (2005) 145 FCR 442; [2005] FCAFC 135 Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 Sampi v State of Western Australia (2005) 224 ALR 358; [2005] FCA 1567 Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 1716 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9 Warria v State of Queensland [2004] FCA 1572 Wandarang, Alawa, Marra & Ngalakan Peoples v Northern Territory of Australia [2000] FCA 923 Mary Yarmirr & Ors v The Northern Territory of Australia & Ors (1998) FCR 533; [1998] FCA 771
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate