Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
North East Equity Pty Ltd (ACN 009 248 819) v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 074 270 938) [2010] FCAFC 60 Citation: North East Equity Pty Ltd (ACN 009 248 819) v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 074 270 938) [2010] FCAFC 60
Appeal from: North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1189
Parties: NORTH EAST EQUITY PTY LTD (ACN 009 248 819) v PROUD NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 074 270 938) and DAVID LEWIS PROUD
File number: WAD 220 of 2008
Judges: SUNDBERG, SIOPIS AND GREENWOOD JJ
Date of judgment: 8 June 2010
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – contract for supply and installation of plant and equipment to improve carrot processing plant – pre‑contractual representations – identification of representations – whether false – representations as to future matters without reasonable cause deemed to be misleading – construction of s 51A of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – evidential burden on representor – persuasive burden not reversed – failure of trial judge to determine whether representations made without reasonable cause – consequence of failure – loss and damage – causation – "no transaction" damages – alternative methods of calculating damages – whether appropriate measure of damages the difference between price paid for plant and true value at purchase – assessment where representee locked into retention of plant.
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A and 52
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Sports Challenge [2002] FCA 1276 applied Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592 applied Echo Tasmania Pty Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries PLC [2008] FCAFC 58 considered Fubilian Catering Services Ltd v Compass Group (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 53 cited Fubilian Catering Services Ltd v Compass Group (Australia) Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1205 applied Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 1 cited Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 applied Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 applied HTW Valuers v Astonland Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 640 applied I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109 cited Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 cited Kizbeau Pty Ltd v W G & B Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 281 cited Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494 cited McAllister v Richmond Brewing Co. (NSW) Pty Ltd (1942) 42 SR (NSW) 187 cited Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australia Planning Commission (2004) 29 WAR 273 distinguished Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388 cited North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1587 discussed North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1189 cited Peek v Derry (1887) 37 Ch D 541 cited Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 considered Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 cited Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1997] AC 254 considered Toteff v Antonas (1952) 87 CLR 647 considered Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate