Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aye v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 69 Citation: Aye v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCAFC 69
Appeal from: Aye v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 978
Parties: ZIN MON AYE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP, MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL and MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS
File number: NSD 1031 of 2009
Judges: SPENDER, LANDER AND MCKERRACHER JJ
Date of judgment: 11 June 2010
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from an order of a judge of this Court – application to review a decision of the Minister for Foreign Affairs and the Migration Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) was dismissed – the Tribunal affirmed decision to cancel visa on the ground that the Minister determined the appellant was a person whose presence in Australia is or would be contrary to Australia's foreign policy interests – Minister for Foreign Affairs' decision made under the Migration Regulations 1994(Cth) – decision is a privative or purported privative clause decision and therefore cannot be reviewed under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) (the ADJR Act) – if decision was made pursuant to a prerogative power it still cannot be reviewed under the ADJR Act – whether the decision is justiciable pursuant to s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – decision is susceptible to review depending upon the character and nature of the decision and not upon whether the decision was made under a legislative instrument or prerogative – if the matter was remitted to the Minister for Foreign Affairs the Minister would make the same decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate